intervention 5 (game)

according to the last tutorial feedback, I am a little aware the older you are the wiser you are, the more respected to be given and there is always this barrier attached to it when it comes to communication.

so what can help me to tackle this issue? could be a game? in the game, give them the role, the game is to play that role of being someone else, and see how they act and how they interact and how they feel. 

so I invited one of the stakeholder to play the game with her family, and then interview her feelings, Does the game really help communication? Can it overcome the barriers of power?

interview:

stakeholder feeling: Playing games can indeed strengthen the relationship between family member and make you temporarily forget about power and status. However, one thing is not good. When playing games, most of your energy is on the game, and you forget to communicate.

intervention 4: explore with stakeholder about the impact of seating arrangements on communication

here is their seat arrangement in their family:

Laissez-faire type:

Pluralistic type:

Consensual type:

Protective type:

Reflection

From the previous research, it was found that Protective type and Laissez-faire type lacked communication, and during the discussion, I found that in these two type family, there is usually a seating arrangement at the dining table. Their seats are arranged according to the family seat, but this is unconscious

In the other two types:Consensual and Pluralistic, they rarely have fixed seats, and they do not arrange seats according to family status. They communicate more with their family members, less conflicts, and have a good relationship with family members.

So I think the seat arrangement and family status and rights hinder the communication between children and parents to some extent, and Communication will be affected by power. If I want to promote communication between different generations, I must first make them aware of this problem. So how can we make people aware of this problem? This will be my next intervention

Next step and ideas:


My previous interventions focused on how to reduce the conflict between different generations, but I found that communication is a long-term process,this problem cannot be changed in the short term. And I also found that if two people disagree, you can hardly expect a decent response from the other person. Normally, he will defend himself and try to lead your thinking and judgments astray. A few months later, when the old words are brought up again, you will find that no one has changed their minds, as if the previous argument has never happened. 

So in the next intervention, I will first throw a question or point of view to the other person, let him think or study carefully, don’t worry about asking the answer, let him digest it in his mind first, and challenge his original concept. ( inspired by the book: The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe)

I will design a dining table. This is not an ordinary dining table, but a dining table that can reflect the status of the family. I will place it downstairs in my house or in the park, so that people passing by can think about the meaning of the dining table, and interview their feelings. I will make the next intervention based on the feedback I get.

Book “Shared Experiences in Human Communication”

At first, I understood that communication is the exchange and transmission of information. It was not until I read the book “Shared Experiences in Human Communication” that I could really understand the process of re-understanding communication from a very basic level.

reflection

The following is my reflection after reading this book:

  • The concept of communication encompasses the process by which all people influence each other.
  • How different communication methods will reflect different person relationships.
  • Non-verbal communication basically defines the interpersonal relationship between each other.
  • Although language can be used to communicate almost everything, nonverbal responses only have a relatively limited range of communication. Nonverbal responses are often used to communicate feelings, preferences and preferences, and to emphasize or refute to correct those feelings communicated with language. Non-verbal communication can superimpose another layer of meaning on top of verbal information.
  • When interpersonal communication forces participants to accept the pressure of interacting with the future, interpersonal communication is destructive, because it makes participants more vulnerable; when interpersonal communication only enhances the spread of information does not affect the value and attitude behind people When interpersonal communication is neutral; when interpersonal communication is regarded as curative, it means that it inspires an individual’s insight into or readjustment to the world, and it allows people to carry out future developments in a more satisfying way. Social interaction.
  • Intentional and unintentional communication. A lot of our daily communication is consciously motivated. For example, if we want to impress in front of a special person, we will change into carefully selected clothes when we go out. However, we have learned from the advertisements selling toothpaste and mouthwash. Although exquisite clothes can convey a good impression, bad breath and unclean teeth will still unintentionally reveal their less satisfactory side. . Unintentional communication is undoubtedly the most maddening communication method, because you will not receive corrective feedback from others. When we are well-dressed but still unable to date the person we like, we will feel very confused, but in fact this is not due to the clothes

reflection and secondary research

From my first intervention (friend’s experience on blind dates), I found that many boys’ thinking is still very traditional, and a large part of it is influenced by their parents. We can see that there are big different concept between young generation and old generation, and traditional concept is still spread among the boys. Men’s and women’s thinking are still different, so why don’t girls? Is it because of the feminism in recent years? and the society’s requirements for women’s status are getting higher and higher? so I might consider adding feminism to my intervention.

From the last week, I looked for some what other medium exist and looked at example from around the world that what are other people doing, what other organisations doing. I did some research on jewellery brand, beauty brand and some TV reality show related to arrange marriages.

I found that some jewellery brands have gone from the initial concept of “diamonds are forever, a diamond will last forever, and a lifetime of happiness” to the present “couples in love may get married, or they may choose not to get married.” This means that although feminism and celibacy are on the rise. The De Beers report pointed out that although Chinese women’s purchase of diamond products at their own expense is on the rise, diamonds are still the most luxurious gift that Chinese women want to receive. On the one hand, they are willing to pay for their own pockets, and on the other hand they do not reject the multiple psychology of receiving diamond jewelry gifts. As the divorce rate increases, the lonely single society is likely to generate more demands for true love.

From the current point of view, some successful cases of brands are still more focused on the problem itself. For example, the “Marriage Market” short film launched by Japanese high-end skin care brand SK-II last year showed a new generation of Chinese women’s views on marriage and love, such as “I don’t want to get married for marriage, that would not be happy”, and detonated social media. In the process of constantly testing the water temperature, the commercial market has been quite tolerant of the values of women’s empowerment, “this will encourage brands to be more brave.”

I am also watching some dating TV show related to arranged marriages, like TOO HOT TOO HANDLE, LOVE TO BLIND, DATING AROUND, and some chinese dating reality show .

NEXT STEP:

do more research on academic resources can relate to what I am doing, use theories to construct my intervention.

look at example from around the world that what are other people doing what are organisations doing charities, and what other mediums exist.

Intervention 1 (wear mask to communicate)

This is my small intervention 1, I used mask as a technique, drawing their mood on the mask and wear their mask to communicate with other people, but can’t speak, only rely on body language, this lasted for 4 days. Finally, observe whether they rely on the mask to have better communication.

FEEDBACK

after the intervention, I got some feedback and their feelings from participants:

  • at the beginning, they were unfamiliar, and a little embarrassed;
  • if don’t draw something on the mask, it’s difficult to express(without the help of the drawing, they don’t know how to express)
  • they can basically understand each other’s meaning, but there is also a slight deviation in the details
  • can’t feel the other person’s mood
  • without training, it is difficult to express with body language

REFLECTION

In the beginning, for my small intervention 1 and 2. Before the experiment, I think that communication and attractiveness are important, but I started to forget this in the following steps. I used mask as a technique, though it resolves a little embarrassment, it also increase the difficulty of communication. There are few information acquisition channels for online communication, a lot of interactive information is hidden, and it is difficult to feel the other’s person mood. And I found that if you want to increase the sense of communication and interaction, the content and process of communication will become more complicated. So how to make my project creative and interactive and not just like an only solution for temporary something I need to think more about in the future.

For the next step, I will continue to develop my intervention of the online drama therapy, develop the digital story. I also will consider the drawing as a technique to help people have a better communication style. (I also will do more secondary research on other therapy: https://www.verywellmind.com/art-therapy-for-troubled-teens-2610348 https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-gestalt-therapy-4584583 https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-art-therapy-2795755 ) and my intervention will focus on communication, interaction and creativity.

PROCESS OF INTERVENTION

FIRST DAY

SECOND DAY

THIRD DAY

FOURTH DAY

REFLECTION

The process of discovering ‘The Change I Want to See’ took a personal shift in Project Five, from dating corner to generation gap.

After did some research on generational conflict and techniques that mediator use, I think the best conflict solution is the way of communication. Adjusting their communication style is a method to reduce conflict. I think they need a mediator, someone they respect, maybe a close family, friend or relative or online platform. Come from a place of wanting to be understand each other better rather than proving that parent wrong.

The medium of communication is very important. There are two mediums that I think are feasible.

  • Matchmaker (face to face support interventions for reducing conflict) set up a counseling in the dating app or dating website.
  • online platform (digital interventions targeting parents and child relationships) watching the interactive movie with parents.

The goal of conflict resolution therapy is to help all parties involved feel as if they have achieved a “win-win” scenario, but it is difficult to do, because parents and children have cognitive biases, my challenge is to challenge traditional attitude, the position of this project is to help the person being in a position to get married, make the right decision and to not be forced into making the wrong decision. And I found that there are not many platform to deal with the generation conflict, most of the platform focus on couple relationship, so it is also very difficult to make study case.

In order to guide the focus of my research further, the following three aspect that I think I should consider in this project in the future.

  • understand what is the need behind the conflict between the two sides.(No one wants to conflict for the sake of conflict. The reason why the conflict cannot be resolved is probably because some of the needs of the conflicting party have been ignored, such as respect, love, and attention.  If you want to stay entangled in conflicting content, these content may be longer than any Qiong Yao novel, and you may never find its central idea.)
  • Ensure a platform where both parties to the conflict are safe and can receive support.(Let both parties relax, feel comfortable, and get help from the process. Don’t let the process of conflict resolution turn into a trial meeting. No one is willing to spend a minute at a meeting that criticizes oneself.)
  • Let the conflicting parties use specific and executable language to express their needs and requests to the other party (You can’t make everyone think that “the women is the most beautiful” because everyone’s perceptions and standards are different, so if you say, “Bring me something good!”, someone might give you a cup of  urine, because some people think that this is delicious! If you don’t want others to bring you a glass of urine, try to be specific.  “Give me a glass of orange juice.”, “I think you can go home straight after get off work.”…

In relation to stakeholders, I initially identified 3 key stakeholder groups, the first being experts(dating agent) and the second being users(parents), the third being users(young generations). As my project has progressed, I have moved onto defining further to be government. Gaining stakeholder feedback is something I have struggled with on this project, I interviewed with the person who forced to blind date by her parents, and also interviewed with matchmaker who work in the dating corner, but received very little feedback. Consequently, stakeholder engagement is something I really need to extensively work on over the coming weeks.

Reflection

after did some research on generational conflict and techniques that mediator use, I think the best conflict solution is the way of communication. Adjusting their communication style is a method to reduce conflict. I think they need a mediator, someone they respect, maybe a close family, friend or relative or online platform. Come from a place of wanting to be understand each other better rather than proving that parent wrong.

The medium of communication is very important. There are two mediums that I think are feasible.

  • Matchmaker (face to face support interventions for reducing conflict)
  • online platform (digital interventions targeting parents and child relationships)